v3: Health Signal Expansion — CDC Disease Journal and STAT News

The meter gains dedicated pandemic and disease intelligence: the CDC Emerging Infectious Diseases peer-reviewed journal and STAT News join the source list. A new health-specific lexicon (weights v3) gives outbreak and contagion language the weight it deserves.

The scenarios WakeUpNeo.ai is designed to detect — systemic crises, rapid societal disruption — include pandemic outbreaks. Yet the original v1 source list was entirely focused on general news: BBC, Al Jazeera, NPR, and similar outlets. These are excellent at covering a pandemic once it is already global news. They are poor at detecting the early peer-reviewed signals that precede the headlines by weeks.

Two new sources

SourceFeed typeVeracityPoll intervalWhy it matters
CDC Emerging Infectious DiseasesPeer-reviewed journal — ahead-of-print0.9530 minWHO-affiliated journal publishing novel outbreak investigations, novel pathogens, and drug-resistance findings before mainstream press coverage
STAT NewsSpecialist health & science journalism0.905 minDedicated biomedical reporting — covers clinical trials, outbreak updates, and public health policy faster and with more depth than general outlets

Why CDC EID specifically?

The CDC publishes several RSS feeds. The newsroom feed covers agency press releases — useful for policy announcements, but slow and filtered through public affairs. The Emerging Infectious Diseases journal ahead-of-print feed is different: it surfaces peer-reviewed research the moment it clears editorial review, before the print issue is assembled. This means novel H5N1 variants, new drug-resistant bacterial strains, and emerging respiratory pathogens appear in our pipeline as early as any outlet in the world can report them.

The v3 lexicon

Adding disease-focused sources without updating the scoring lexicon would undercount their signal. A headline reading "novel respiratory pathogen with 40% case fatality rate" contains none of the classic urgency keywords — "war", "attack", "missile" — that the v1 and v2 lexicon was tuned for. The v3 lexicon corrects this.

Effect on the score

In routine news cycles the new keywords will trigger rarely — most days there is no major outbreak story. When they do trigger, they should trigger sharply: a simultaneous WHO emergency declaration, novel pathogen paper in CDC EID, and STAT News coverage of hospital capacity strain would now produce a meaningfully higher meter reading than the same story would have under v2. This asymmetry is intentional. Pandemic risk is a tail risk — it spends most of its time near zero and then moves very fast.

What this does not change

The overall scoring formula — 60% news layer, 40% market layer — is unchanged. The new sources feed into the same 72-hour rolling window and are subject to the same top-100 article mean that determines the news score. No threshold or weight in the final blend has moved. v3 is purely an expansion of coverage breadth and lexical precision.